Monday, March 28, 2011

Fwd: [Right to Education] Supreme Court of India in State of U.P. vs...



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ashok Agarwal <notification+kr4marbae4mn@facebookmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:10 PM
Subject: [Right to Education] Supreme Court of India in State of U.P. vs...
To: Palash Biswas <palashbiswaskl@gmail.com>


Supreme Court of India in State of U.P. vs  Bhupendra Nath Tripathi (2010) 13 SCC 203 (decided on 29.10.2010) has held that the State as at present  is under the constitutional obligation to provide education to all children of the age of 6 to 14 years. The State by virtue of Article 21-A is bound to provide free education, create necessary infrastructure and effective machinery for the proper implementation of the right and meet total expenditure of the schools to that extent. Right to education guaranteed by Article 21-A would remain illusory in the absence of the State taking adequate steps to have required number of schools manned by efficient and qualified teachers.
Ashok Agarwal 3:10pm Mar 28
Supreme Court of India in State of U.P. vs Bhupendra Nath Tripathi (2010) 13 SCC 203 (decided on 29.10.2010) has held that the State as at present is under the constitutional obligation to provide education to all children of the age of 6 to 14 years. The State by virtue of Article 21-A is bound to provide free education, create necessary infrastructure and effective machinery for the proper implementation of the right and meet total expenditure of the schools to that extent. Right to education guaranteed by Article 21-A would remain illusory in the absence of the State taking adequate steps to have required number of schools manned by efficient and qualified teachers.

View Post on Facebook · Edit Email Settings · Reply to this email to add a comment.



--
Palash Biswas
Pl Read:
http://nandigramunited-banga.blogspot.com/

No comments:

Post a Comment