The timing of the UN's conclusions smell like propaganda that is part of the International Socialists plan to create feelings that overthrowing Bashar Assad would be a good idea to build support for their planned invasion of Syria. It should be noted that the secular left liberal Democratic Party in the USA intends on overthrowing Bashar Assad and installing a Muslim Brotherhood government in Syria and that after doing this in Egypt the Muslim Brotherhood run military government that they installed announced that they and Iran are embarking on building a nuclear program in Egypt, which of course means developing nuclear weapons to use against Israel. According to a former CIA Director of Central Asia it was the official policy of the US government before the Democratic Socialists of America that have completely infiltrated the Democratic Party took control of the Federal government, that it is better to leave Bashar Assad in power because if he was removed a Muslim Brotherhood government would be installed and this would be far worse for the world than leaving Assad in power. In other words the issue for the Democratic Socialists of America isn't nuclear weapons in the hands of the Muslim terrorists but rather the issue is whose hands they are in. If it is ok for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt to embark on a nuclear program then it will be ok for the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria to do so. The Democratic Socialists of America belong in Guantanamo along with their Muslim Brotherhood cohorts.
U.N. confirms suspicions about Syrian mystery
Israel hit complex that 'should have been declared'
Posted: November 02, 2011
9:12 pm Eastern
By Stewart Stogel
© 2011 WND
UNITED NATIONS – The International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations nuclear watchdog, in its annual report to the General Assembly, this week confirmed that the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad covertly had been working to build nuclear weapons.
The agency acknowledged that Israel's September 2007 attack on a secret military complex in northeast Syria ("Operation Orchard") hit a complex very likely containing a covert nuclear reactor.
Yukia Amano told the General Assembly, "In the case of Syria, the agency recently came to the conclusion that it is very likely that a building destroyed at the Dair Alzour site in 2007 was a nuclear reactor that should have been declared to the agency."
Jerusalem's attack was reported to have been a two-day operation involving both the Israeli Air Force and an elite team of special-force troops on the ground.
On September 16, Amos Yadin, the chief of Israeli military intelligence, told a Knesset committee that "Israel had regained its deterrent capability."
The IAEA revelations are just the latest developments adding to the international pressure on the Assad government which has been under a de-facto civil war since last April.
(Story continues below)
Assad himself recently was labeled by U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon as a "liar" who had personally misled him on several recent occasions.
President Barack Obama has publicly called for the Syrian president "to step down."
Now the IAEA has officially called Syria's credibility into question.
Neither the U.S./U.N. mission nor the Israeli mission responded to requests for comment on the IAEA presentation.
And neither took the opportunity to address the two-day U.N. meeting.
Syria's UN ambassador Bashar Ja'afari did take a brief moment to speak to WND on the IAEA report.
Ja'afari insisted that Amano's report to the General Assembly was "politically" motivated by Washington and Jerusalem to add pressure on his government and help the Syrian rebels.
Ja'afari repeatedly complained about Israel's refusal to join the International Atomic Energy Agency and give the U.N. watchdog unfettered access to its nuclear facility in the Negev Desert.
That facility, near the town of Dimona, is rumored to be the heart of Israel's nuclear defense industry where most of its suspected atomic weapons are built.
Israel's defiance of the IAEA has been successful because of Washington's "backing," said the Syrian.
The Syrian ambassador elaborated on what he believed were contradictions in the IAEA report.
"We are greatly concerned with the content of his statement and his allegations about Syria … I refute all the remarks he has made about Syria … Mr. Amano is contradicting his predecessor's remarks. Mohamed Elbradei said in his recent book that there was no information whatsoever on the so-called nuclear program that confirmed the presence of a reactor," he said.
Ja'afari went on to quote ElBaradei as saying that the 2007 attack was a "blatant example of nuclear hypocrisy." In short, the former IAEA chief was complaining about a "double standard." One applied to Israel, another to the Arab states.
The Syrian complained about former U.S./U.N. Ambassador John Bolton "running interference" for Israel, especially on the nuclear issue and backing the 2007 attack.
Bolton told WND, "It is an honor to be criticized by a dictator's envoy. If the Syrian ambassador had any decency, he would resign his job in protest."
Amano also made passing references to ongoing questions regarding nuclear issues with both Iran and the North Koreans.
The North Koreans opted to remain silent, but the Iranians, like the Syrians, took exception to the IAEA report.
Said Iran's ambassador Eshagh al-Habib, "Unfortunately, over the past decade a few Western countries have pursued a selective and politically motivated approach towards the verification activities of the IAEA. I would like to reiterate that one of the neglected tasks of the IAEA is its inaction in the nuclear disarmament process."
Again both the U.S. and Israeli missions offered no comment
Bro. James D Albright
No comments:
Post a Comment